Leadership

Small Business Hiring in 2026: What to Do When 87% of Owners See No Qualified Applicants

NFIB's September survey puts labor quality at a record 26% of owners' top problem. Here is how to hire, pay, and keep people when the pool is thin.

Renata Oyelaran

Leadership & Org Design Consultant

Published 7 min read
Confident woman interviewing candidate in a modern office. Ideal for business and HR visuals.
In this article 8 sections

Small business hiring is harder than usual: in September 2026, 87 percent of owners who were hiring or trying to hire reported few or no qualified applicants, and 26 percent named labor quality as their biggest problem, a record. The fix is a wider search, a faster process, a clear pay position, and stronger retention.

Upstart Wire covers how growing companies keep people and process from breaking, and the latest NFIB survey puts hiring at the center. This guide is for owners and founders with fewer than 50 employees who need to fill roles without overpaying or lowering the bar. It turns the survey data into a practical plan.

What Does the September NFIB Data Say About Hiring?

The data shows a tight, cautious market. The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell 0.8 points to 97.9, slightly below its 52-year average of 98, according to the National Association of Manufacturers' summary of the report. Labor quality or availability was the top concern at 26 percent, up 3 points.

Senior woman in business suit shaking hands across a table in an office environment.

The wider picture matters for hiring decisions. PYMNTS reports that labor concerns were the top issue for three straight months and sit 14 points above the 12 percent historical average. Inflation ranked second at 20 percent, against a 7 percent average. NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg summed it up this way: "Small business owners are proceeding with caution."

Other numbers explain that caution. A net 31 percent of owners raised prices, a net 28 percent raised compensation, and net profit trends sit at negative 20 percent. Only 7 percent said it was a good time to expand. Hiring is happening, but owners are watching every dollar while they do it.

How Do You Widen the Applicant Pool Without Lowering the Bar?

Start by rewriting the role around outcomes and trainable skills. A list of ten required tools filters out good people who could learn eight of them in a month. Name the three skills that truly cannot be taught quickly, and treat the rest as training.

Positive young female employee with curly blond hair in elegant clothes smiling while having video call via laptop sitting at table with notebook in modern office

Then change how you test. A resume tells you what someone did, and a short paid work sample tells you what they can do. Give candidates a two-hour task that mirrors the real job, pay them for it, and score each result against the same checklist. This surfaces strong people whose resumes look ordinary.

Use these sources in order of cost, from cheapest to most expensive.

  1. Your own staff, who can refer people they would work next to.
  2. Past applicants who nearly made the cut.
  3. Local community colleges, trade schools, and apprenticeship programs.
  4. Part-time or contract workers who may want a permanent role.
  5. Paid job boards, once the cheaper channels run dry.

Before you post anything, confirm you actually need a hire. Our checklist of seven signs your business is ready to hire its first employee also works as a test for any additional hire.

How Fast Does Your Hiring Process Need to Be?

Fast enough that a good candidate does not take another offer while you deliberate. In a thin market, the strongest applicants often have several options within days. A process that takes four weeks will lose most of them.

Set a simple clock. Reply to every applicant within 48 hours. Hold the first interview within a week of the application. Decide within 48 hours of the last interview. Keep the number of interview rounds to two, and give every candidate the same structured questions so decisions are quick and fair.

Two women collaborating on a laptop in a modern office space, focusing on teamwork.

Be honest about the offer. State pay, schedule, and the first 90 days in plain language. Candidates who know what to expect accept faster and quit less. Hidden details, such as weekend shifts or unpaid training, tend to surface later and cost you the hire.

How Should You Set Pay When Costs Are Squeezed?

Match the market for the role, and compete on other terms where you cannot. The NFIB data shows a net 28 percent of owners raised compensation recently, and 20 percent plan to raise it soon. Owners are moving pay, but profit trends are weak, so you need a deliberate approach, not a reflex.

Check three or four local postings for the same job and note the pay range. If your offer sits well below them, expect long vacancies. If it is within a few percent, improve other terms: predictable schedules, a clear 90-day raise review, paid training time, or a small signing bonus tied to the first six months.

Watch your borrowing costs too. A net 8 percent of owners paid higher interest rates on their latest loan, up 4 points. If you plan to hire on borrowed money, run the numbers using the guidance in our playbook for variable-rate debt after the Fed's rate hike. A new salary is a fixed cost, and it should survive a slow quarter.

Why Is Retention the Cheapest Hiring Strategy?

Replacing a worker means advertising, interviewing, onboarding, and a stretch of reduced output while the new person learns the job. With 87 percent of hiring owners seeing few qualified applicants, a vacancy can also last for months. Keeping a good employee avoids all of that.

A group of Asian colleagues engaged in a lively discussion in a modern office setting.

Start with regular conversations. A weekly or biweekly check-in lets you catch frustration early, before it becomes a resignation. Our guide to running a one-on-one people look forward to gives a simple format. Ask what is blocking the person, what they want to learn, and what would make them stay.

Then close the gap on pay for current staff. It is a common mistake to offer a new hire more than a loyal employee earns for the same job. That gap quietly drives resignations. Review pay for existing roles at least twice a year, and fix obvious inequities before someone else does it for you.

Finally, build a growth path. Small companies cannot offer large promotion ladders, but they can offer new responsibilities, cross-training, and a named next role. A person who sees a route forward is far more likely to stay through a hard year.

How Do You Plan the First 90 Days of a New Hire?

A structured start protects the hire you worked hard to find. In a thin market, losing a new employee in the first quarter sends you back to an empty pipeline. A written 90-day plan costs an hour to draft and prevents most early exits.

Break the plan into three stages. In the first week, cover logistics, introductions, and one small win the person can finish alone. In the first month, assign a clear set of tasks with a named person who answers questions. By day 90, hold a review that covers results, pay, and next steps.

Put numbers on it. For example, a role paying $20 an hour at 40 hours a week costs about $3,200 in wages over a four-week stretch. If a new hire reaches half productivity in that period, you have effectively spent $1,600 in training time before the person pays back. Seen that way, an hour a week of coaching is a bargain, and quitting in week five is an expensive loss.

Check in at days 7, 30, and 60 with the same three questions. What is going well? What is confusing? What would you change? Write the answers down. The patterns tell you whether your job description, your training, or your management needs adjustment, and they give you proof when you need to fix a process.

What Should You Avoid When the Pool Is Thin?

Do not hire the first person who says yes. A bad hire in a small team costs more than an empty seat, because it damages morale and consumes manager time. Stick to your scorecard, even when you are desperate.

Do not promise what you cannot deliver. Overselling the role leads to early quits, which puts you back at square one. And do not ignore the rest of your cost base while you chase talent. Upstart Wire's editors suggest checking cash runway before you add payroll, since a hire made in a panic can strain a thin margin.

Conclusion: Make Your Process the Advantage

The practical answer is to widen the pool through trainable skills and work samples, move quickly, set pay with local data, and put real effort into keeping the people you already have. None of those steps needs a large budget.

Keep the plan modest and repeatable, so you can run it again the next time a seat opens. Your next step this week is small. Rewrite one open job around outcomes, set a 48-hour reply rule, and schedule a one-on-one with each current employee. Those three actions improve your hiring and your retention at the same time.

What did the NFIB report say about hiring in September 2026?
The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell 0.8 points to 97.9. Labor quality or availability was the top problem for 26 percent of owners, a record. Among owners hiring or trying to hire, 87 percent reported few or no qualified applicants. A net 28 percent raised compensation, and 20 percent plan to raise pay soon.
Should a small business raise pay to attract applicants?
Sometimes, but pay alone rarely fixes a thin pool. Compare your offer with local postings for the same role first, then raise it only where you are clearly below market. Pair any increase with faster hiring, clearer duties, and a defined path to a raise, because those cost less than a permanent wage jump.
How can I hire when applicants lack the exact skills?
Hire for the skills that are hard to teach, such as reliability and judgment, and train the rest. Write a short list of must-have skills, test them with a paid work sample, and budget a few weeks of structured training. This widens your pool without lowering the bar on results.
Is it cheaper to keep an employee than to hire a new one?
Usually yes. Replacing someone means advertising, interviewing, onboarding, and a stretch of reduced output while the new hire learns the role. With 87 percent of hiring owners reporting few qualified applicants, a vacancy can last months, so regular one-on-ones and fair pay for current staff are often the better value.

Written by

Renata Oyelaran

Leadership & Org Design Consultant

15+ years experience

Renata Oyelaran runs an independent leadership consultancy that works exclusively with founders scaling past their first ten, fifty, and two-hundred employees — the three headcount thresholds she says break more companies than any market downturn. Before consulting, she led people operations at two venture-backed startups through Series B, and holds a graduate degree in organizational psychology. She's allergic to management fads and writes with a bias toward what's been tested inside real companies, not what sounds good in a keynote.

Credentials

  • M.S., Organizational Psychology
  • Former Head of People, two Series B startups
  • Independent advisor to 60+ startups on org design and hiring